Review Request #111531 - Created July 16, 2013 and discarded
The unit test is broken, I think b/c the logic is wrong in the code, i.e. it checked for const and applied read/write to it, whereas non-const got only read access. Also, how should the stuff with the "do I have an argument or not?" work? the test used to have an operator++(int) or so which simply did nothing?
unit tests pass, but are not checking the operator++(int) case anymore.