Only use parallel sorting when sorting by name
Review Request #108309 - Created Jan. 9, 2013 and submitted - Latest diff uploaded
It seems that comparing two dates is less reentrant than it might seem at first sight. In order to prevent crashes and other problems, I propose to only use multiple threads for sorting when sorting by "Name", because naturally comparing strings is the only expensive comparison function. Does anyone see a problem with this? I really don't want to commit stupid new bugs at this point in the release cycle ;-)
Sorting works OK, verified that it uses only one thread when not sorting by name.